Hide Forgot
Spec: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/cwallpaper.spec SRPM: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/cwallpaper-0.3.2-2.fc13.src.rpm Description: CWallpaper is a graphical wallpaper changing program designed to be used with environments such as Fluxbox and Blackbox which lack their own wallpaper changing programs. It is designed to be compatible with nearly every desktop environment and root wallpaper changer possible. Current Features: * Compatible with fbsetbg, bsetbg, esetroot, feh. * Also has KDE Desktop, Nautilus, and Rox support through shell scripts. * MS Windows support, using bsetroot from the Blackbox for Windows project. * Thumbnail preview of the wallpaper. * Loading different config files from command line. * Long wallpaper lists. * A GTK and FLTK version. ________________________________________________________________________________ Koji scratch builds: F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2351737 F-13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2351789 Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2351874 ________________________________________________________________________________ $ rpmlint {SPECS,SRPMS,RPMS/i686}/cwallpaper* SPECS/cwallpaper.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fbsetbg -> setback, subset, besetting cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) feh -> eh, fee, fen cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fbsetbg -> setback, subset, besetting cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetbg -> subset, setback, basset cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esetroot -> beetroot, esotropia, restroom cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US feh -> eh, fee, fen cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetroot -> beetroot, betroths, betroth cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure cwallpaper.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fbsetbg -> setback, subset, besetting cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) feh -> eh, fee, fen cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fbsetbg -> setback, subset, besetting cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetbg -> subset, setback, basset cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esetroot -> beetroot, esotropia, restroom cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US feh -> eh, fee, fen cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetroot -> beetroot, betroths, betroth cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure cwallpaper.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/cwallpaper cwallpaper.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cwallpaper 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 20 warnings.
Hi Germán, I had a look at your package, which looks almost fine to me. General question: You are packaging the 0.3.2 GTK version of cwallpaper, not the newer versions (0.3.3 -> 0.4.2) that are based on fltk, which is also part of Fedora. What is your reason for this? Looking at the spec file: * Your summary could even be more concise and skip the "A" at the beginning. * Add "rm -rf %{buildroot}" to the beginning of the %install section to get rid of rpmlint's no-cleaning-of-buildroot warning. The build generates ~12 warnings, none of which seems critical. Upstream might still be interested in fixing those. Here's an informal review - I'm still working on my reviewing skills... $ rpmlint cwallpaper.spec /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/cwallpaper* cwallpaper.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fbsetbg -> setback, subset, besetting cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) feh -> eh, fee, fen cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fbsetbg -> setback, subset, besetting cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetbg -> subset, setback, basset cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esetroot -> beetroot, esotropia, restroom cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US feh -> eh, fee, fen cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetroot -> beetroot, betroths, betroth cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure cwallpaper.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cwallpaper cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fbsetbg -> setback, subset, besetting cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) feh -> eh, fee, fen cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fbsetbg -> setback, subset, besetting cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetbg -> subset, setback, basset cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esetroot -> beetroot, esotropia, restroom cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US feh -> eh, fee, fen cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetroot -> beetroot, betroths, betroth cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure cwallpaper.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 19 warnings. A manual page is not available, the no-cleaning-of-buildroot warning can be fixed, all others seem to be false positives. I don't see the unstripped-binary-or-object warning that you saw, and the binary is stripped. --------------------------------- key: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. $ md5sum cwallpaper-0.3.2.tar.gz* 85ca1399e8960097cbb6580dceb47163 cwallpaper-0.3.2.tar.gz 85ca1399e8960097cbb6580dceb47163 cwallpaper-0.3.2.tar.gz.1 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [.] MUST: .so files must go in a -devel package. [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [-] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) ... [.] SHOULD: description and summary translations for supported Non-English languages. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [X] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Trying to run it in mock, I get: mock-chroot> cwallpaper Attempting to use the config file: /builddir/.config/cwallpaper/config. Config file was not found, using internal defaults (Hope you have fbsetbg :D ). Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module": libpk-gtk-module.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module": libcanberra-gtk-module.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory (cwallpaper:3249): Pango-WARNING **: failed to choose a font, expect ugly output. engine-type='PangoRenderFc', script='latin' Loading (cwallpaper:3249): Pango-WARNING **: failed to choose a font, expect ugly output. engine-type='PangoRenderFc', script='common' (cwallpaper:3249): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed Quiting peaceablly And a window with no fonts displayed. I am not into GTK enough to decide if this is not supposed to work in mock, or something that needs to be fixed. [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg. [.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ... [X] SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts. Would be nice to have a manpage - but even the Debian packaged version doesn't have one.
I agree with Ralph's comments. Germán, if you plan to maintain this package for EPEL too, you must clean the buildroot at the beginning of %install. Otherwise, it's not necessary and you can also remove the BuildRoot tag. (In reply to comment #1) > [X] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. > And a window with no fonts displayed. > I am not into GTK enough to decide if this is not supposed to work in mock, > or something that needs to be fixed. That's OK. mock doesn't install xorg packages and fonts by default. Thus, GUI applications usually don't work in a mock chroot. Two additional remarks: - drop the the following lines from the %description as they don't really relate to the binary package to be built: * MS Windows support, using bsetroot from the Blackbox for Windows project. * A GTK and FLTK version. - I suggest to add a desktop icon to the package. You can download one at http://manualinux.my-place.us/cwallpaper.html (You should ask the author whether it's free and may be used in Fedora.)
Many thanks to Ralph and Martin for the review and suggestions! Ralph: * I'm packaging the last version for GTK+, which is 0.3.2, to be consistent with Gnome desktop, and because I like GTK more than FLTK :). Also this version works perfectly well (at least for me). * Well, I've added the cleaning of buildroot because in the future someone else could take this package and maintain it for EPEL (but not me, because I'm not interested in, at least by now). * I've changed the Summary as you suggested. * I've also mailed upstream suggesting to add a man page. Martin: * The cleaning of buildroot and the buildroot tag are preserved because as I said above someone else could take this package for EPEL in the future. * I've modified the %description as you suggested. * I can't connect to this site: http://manualinux.my-place.us/cwallpaper.html. I'm going to continue to try later. Thanks again folks! Please find updated files here: SPEC: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/cwallpaper.spec SRPM: http://skytux.fedorapeople.org/packages/cwallpaper-0.3.2-3.fc13.src.rpm ________________________________________________________________________________ rpmlint output: Checking RPM package (cwallpaper-0.3.2-3.fc13.i686.rpm) -------------------- cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fbsetbg -> setback, subset, besetting cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) feh -> eh, fee, fen cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fbsetbg -> setback, subset, besetting cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetbg -> subset, setback, basset cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esetroot -> beetroot, esotropia, restroom cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US feh -> eh, fee, fen cwallpaper.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure cwallpaper.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cwallpaper 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. Checking DEBUG package (cwallpaper-debuginfo-0.3.2-3.fc13.i686.rpm) ---------------------- 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Checking SPEC file (cwallpaper.spec) ------------------ 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Checking SRPM package (cwallpaper-0.3.2-3.fc13.src.rpm) --------------------- cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fbsetbg -> setback, subset, besetting cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) feh -> eh, fee, fen cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fbsetbg -> setback, subset, besetting cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsetbg -> subset, setback, basset cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esetroot -> beetroot, esotropia, restroom cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US feh -> eh, fee, fen cwallpaper.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. ________________________________________________________________________________ Koji builds from scratch: F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2458445 F13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2458454 F14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2458463 F15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2458480
Hi Germán, your package looks fine now. It would be great if you could add an desktop icon for cwallpaper. Do you still have problems to access the icon at http://manualinux.my-place.us/iconos/cwallpaper-48.png ?
Germán, what's the status of this package? Would you still like to maintain it?
Any progress here? Germán, if you're no longer interested in this package, please close the ticket (I will close it if there's no response within a week).
Closed according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews#Submitter_not_responding
I'm sorry Martin, I have been busy and I didn't see your comments before...but now I'm late because the bug is closed...
Not a problem at all, Germán. If you're still interested in the package, feel free to open a new review request, and I'll have a look.