Bug 61872 - If you're going to use an example procmailrc, there's a newer one...
If you're going to use an example procmailrc, there's a newer one...
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: procmail (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Trond Eivind Glomsrxd
Brock Organ
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2002-03-25 08:16 EST by Telsa Gwynne
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:41 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2002-03-25 08:16:38 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Telsa Gwynne 2002-03-25 08:16:34 EST
procmail-3.22-4 appears to have a new example procmailrc in 

Oh. My. Gods. I recognise that :) 

Seriously, I have a newer one which has up-to-date URLs (the ones at the
top are now 404, for example), and better patterns for mailman lists.

The one you have is http://www.linux.org.uk/~telsa/BitsAndPieces/procmailrc-1.0
and I have recently updated it: the current one is procmailrc (no -1.0). I
think it is very very well worth swapping to that one. It has more useful
addresses and better patterns.

It might also be worth substituting something something else for 'shit' in
the 'testing' section. When I wrote that, I didn't expect anyone to be shipping

I'm still stunned someone included that!
Comment 1 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2002-03-25 13:03:38 EST
It got recommended, I looked and it was great :).

Updated your excellent doc file in 3.22-5 - thanks for writing it.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.