Bug 61906 - pxe & mtftp packages not available on IA64 redhat linux, dhcpd not rescent enough to be compatible with pxe
Summary: pxe & mtftp packages not available on IA64 redhat linux, dhcpd not rescent en...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: dhcp
Version: 7.2
Hardware: ia64
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Elliot Lee
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-03-25 21:16 UTC by Nitin Kamble
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-04-15 14:51:58 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nitin Kamble 2002-03-25 21:16:13 UTC
Description of Problem:
There are no pxe and mtptp rpms in ia64 redhat linux distribution. Also the 
dhcpd daemon is required to be updated from www.isc.org to comply with pxe 
support.

Because of this the ia64 linux machine can not be a pxe boot server.


Actual Results:
Not available componentes

Expected Results:
should have these components and working.

Additional Information:
There wasn't any way to submit requests for pxe and mtftp, so I am adding them 
in dhcp component.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2002-04-15 14:51:53 UTC
We can certainly look at this for future ia64 releases.

Comment 2 Elliot Lee 2002-06-21 15:51:58 UTC
Given the fact that the dev86 package only is available on x86 platforms, it's not likely that  
this is going to happen.

Comment 3 Rob Landry 2002-06-28 19:26:11 UTC
Question; what is the dependancy on dev86?

Comment 4 Elliot Lee 2002-06-28 20:00:26 UTC
It has to build all the PXE bootstrap stuff (under /tftpboot/X86PC/UNDI) from source.

There are no theoretical barriers to making dev86 fully portable, but I spent a few hours 
attempting to do so and ran into lots of grotty code that is probably a week or two from 
running on 64-bit systems (can you say "gratuitous use of 'long'"? :).

Comment 5 Rob Landry 2002-07-12 20:21:16 UTC
Now that it's been a bit.  Do we know what it's going to take to get this done.
 And how long that might take?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.