Bug 619205 - [abrt] crash in ufraw-0.17-1.fc13: _lf_detect_cpu_features: Process /usr/bin/ufraw was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
[abrt] crash in ufraw-0.17-1.fc13: _lf_detect_cpu_features: Process /usr/bin/...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 617861
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ufraw (Show other bugs)
i686 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nils Philippsen
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2010-07-28 17:01 EDT by antonio montagnani
Modified: 2010-11-09 09:49 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 09:49:43 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (29.46 KB, text/plain)
2010-07-28 17:01 EDT, antonio montagnani
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description antonio montagnani 2010-07-28 17:01:00 EDT
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: ufraw /home/antonio/imgp1164.pef
comment: I have the doubt that problem is in lensfun
component: ufraw
crash_function: _lf_detect_cpu_features
executable: /usr/bin/ufraw
global_uuid: fe72e89e4612adb6a5b9aa43c425c08df54c767f
package: ufraw-0.17-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/ufraw was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
1.try to open a PEF file coming from a 1stDS camera
Comment 1 antonio montagnani 2010-07-28 17:01:02 EDT
Created attachment 435123 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 antonio montagnani 2010-07-28 18:00:09 EDT
I run ufraw from the command line with the option --lensfun=none and now PEF files from my 1stDS are opened!!!
Comment 3 antonio montagnani 2010-07-28 18:11:51 EDT
and if I install lensfun-devel it works great!!!
Comment 4 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 09:49:43 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 617861 ***
Comment 5 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 09:49:43 EST
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #617861.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.