Bug 621013 - [abrt] crash in gyachi-1.2.9-2.fc13: __memcpy_ssse3: Process /usr/libexec/gyachi/gyachi-upload was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in gyachi-1.2.9-2.fc13: __memcpy_ssse3: Process /usr/libexec/gya...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 597085
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gyachi
Version: 13
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Rahul Sundaram
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:fa184268a062c1dca9566d71f0b...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-08-04 00:56 UTC by Sebastián Ramírez
Modified: 2010-11-08 18:22 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-08 18:22:15 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (67.93 KB, text/plain)
2010-08-04 00:56 UTC, Sebastián Ramírez
no flags Details

Description Sebastián Ramírez 2010-08-04 00:56:07 UTC
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gyachi/gyachi-upload evelinmachado 6dLWMBk_9cxxsL34Dx8xWj8UqT3uSL_04- /dev/video0 wc1.msg.vip.mud.yahoo.com alomarash,beasuama65,gabrielarodrima,giselafgl,jsramirez78,lucresanti,marcebl2,marianaramirez03,robmagh,gamboggi.asoc,rmariana95,washington.suarez,soympia.ar,washington.suarez,wsm.uy
component: gyachi
crash_function: __memcpy_ssse3
executable: /usr/libexec/gyachi/gyachi-upload
global_uuid: fa184268a062c1dca9566d71f0bc93b86f75332d
kernel: 2.6.33.6-147.fc13.i686
package: gyachi-1.2.9-2.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/gyachi/gyachi-upload was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

Comment 1 Sebastián Ramírez 2010-08-04 00:56:21 UTC
Created attachment 436409 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 18:22:15 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 597085 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 18:22:15 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #597085.

Sorry for the inconvenience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.