Bug 62174 - compat-glibc should not provide libdb.so.2?
Summary: compat-glibc should not provide libdb.so.2?
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: compat-glibc   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 7.3
Hardware: i386 Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-03-28 04:58 UTC by Aleksey Nogin
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:41 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-10-04 23:07:59 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Aleksey Nogin 2002-03-28 04:58:58 UTC 
Currently lost of packages need libdb.so.2, but rpm will happily allow one to
remove the db1 package if compat-glibc is installed. We need to make sure either:

- Compat-glibc does not provide libdb.so.2

OR

- Packages that need the "real" db1 (for example, up2date-gnome would not work
without it) s
should require it explicitly (not of them currently do).

OR

- We only have one libdb.so.2 (if that is possible).
Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2004-10-04 23:07:59 UTC 
compat-glibc in RHEL3 doesn't provide any libraries, Fedora Core [123]
don't contain any compat-glibc.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.