Hide Forgot
Description of problem: We have a hardware platform that requires hardware flow control (CTS/RTS) on the serial console. The serial subsystem does not seem to support this. The issues are: 1. Using "r" for flow control does not set UPF_CONS_FLOW in uart_8250_port.flags, which is necessary for wait_for_xmitr() to do flow control. 2. RedHat patch linux-2.6-serial-8250-support-for-dtr-dsr-hardware-flow-control.patch for RH bug 445215 derefs uart_8250_port.port.info, which is NULL early in the boot process, so that if UPF_CONS_FLOW does get set, the kernel OOPSes. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Boot with console=ttyS0,115200n8r (and without quiet, of course). Actual results: Bits dropped all over the datacenter floor during boot. Expected results: Readable boot text that we all know and love. Additional info: We have worked around this issue by reverting the hunk in linux-2.6-serial-8250-support-for-dtr-dsr-hardware-flow-control.patch that changes wait_for_xmitr() and adding UPF_CONS_FLOW to the port flags in serial8250_console_setup(). Obviously this would not work for RH, as it would reopen bug 445215. Unfortunately, I am not familiar enough with the inner workings of the serial and console drivers to find a better solution.
Can't reproduce this bug with 2.6.32-71.el6. Still investigating.
RHEL5 bug, that's why :)
Tom, after checking the code that is in RHEL5 I couldn't see any reference to info, only flags. What kernel version are you using?
We are using kernel 2.6.18-194.11.3. In the patched drivers/serial/8250.c, uart_8250_port.port.info is dereferenced at line 1639 and 1642: 1631 if (up->port.flags & UPF_CONS_FLOW) { 1632 struct uart_info *info = up->port.info; 1633 unsigned int msr; 1634 1635 tmout = 1000000; 1636 while (--tmout) { 1637 msr = serial_in(up, UART_MSR); 1638 1639 if ((info->flags & UIF_CTS_FLOW) && 1640 (msr & UART_MSR_CTS)) 1641 break; 1642 else if ((info->flags & UIF_DSR_FLOW) && 1643 (msr & UART_MSR_DSR)) 1644 break; 1645 1646 udelay(1); 1647 touch_nmi_watchdog(); 1648 } 1649 } But, as noted, this can never execute because UPF_CONS_FLOW cannot be set. It is only set by the code in some ARM architectures (arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/mach-*.c). This is true even with the vanilla 2.6.18 sources. Again, I am not terribly familiar with the serial and console drivers, so it is quite possible that I'm missing something. But it appears this particular code path is only really critical during boot, so perhaps it's just not normally exercised and viewed at higher speeds.
Tom, the serial console requires hardware support in order to have flow control and it seems yours doesn't.
Aristeu, I am confused by your statement. The (custom) hardware that we ship most certainly does have functional CTS/RTS flow control. It is an absolute requirement for our systems, which run at 115200 baud. Without custom patches to the RHEL 5.5 kernel, it is painfully obvious that hardware flow control in the kernel is not being used for the console at boot time. But with the patches described above, it works great. The only questions are whether RedHat will fix the issue and how that would be accomplished without reopening bug 445215.
Hm, it works great here with standard RS232 ports. May I have more details on the hardware to find the proper fix, which probably will need to be pushed upstream too.
I just setup a whitebox with a serial console at 115200, connected it to another machine, and booted without the quiet flag. No characters were dropped. This seemed strange to me, given the fact that the issue is clearly reproducible on our custom hardware. So I talked to a hardware engineer and he explained how the custom console works. We have a custom processor that has two serial ports. One is attached to the PC's physical serial port, and the other is attached to the physical serial port on the front of the box. This processor is responsible for adapting to varying baud rates on the front of the box even though the PC is fixed at 115200. Therefore, it will need to perform flow control as a part of its duties when the baud rate on the front of the box is less than 115200. This means that when both serial ports are operating at 115200 and the machine connected to the serial port (say, a laptop) is fast enough, no flow control is typically needed. But when either (1) the port on the front of the box is set to less than 115200, or (2) the machine connected to the serial port is not fast enough to keep up, flow control is needed. In summary, it is unlikely that you will be able to reproduce this issue unless you can find an old machine that cannot keep up with the kernel's console output at boot. However, that does not mean the problem does not exist. Code inspection clearly shows that hardware flow control is not honored during boot and we have hardware that demonstrates this.
This Bugzilla has been reviewed by Red Hat and is not planned on being addressed in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, and therefore is being closed. If this bug is critical to production systems, please contact your Red Hat support representative and provide a sufficient business justification in order to re-open it.