Spec URL: http://gomix.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-state_machine/rubygem-state_machine.spec SRPM URL: http://gomix.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-state_machine/rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any : Ruby class $ rpmlint -i SPECS/rubygem-state_machine.spec SRPMS/rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-1.fc13.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rubygem-state_machine is already in Fedora. Is it correct that this review request is for recheck of this, because it is long (actually almost one year) since the last rubygem-state_machine is built on koji?
I understand that it has to be treated as a new pkg since the last update its one year old. quote Re-review required for older packages If a package was last updated more than three months ago (running cvs log -r HEAD *.spec can show you this information), you will need to submit a review request and have the package approved by a reviewer as if it were new to Fedora. am i getting it wrong ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
Well, just a confirmation, thanks.
Macro %sitelib is not used anywhere. It can be removed. Package builds in mock without issues. rpmlint lists normal warnings about macros. I have a small wish that there was a -doc package as 573 files of 737 are documentation, but it doesn't take up that much space. In some of my packages %{geminstdir}/test is marked as %doc and not in others. I am guessing we need to agree on this one. I'll ask on the list. This package looks like it is in pretty good shape.
New spec and srpm, -doc pkg produced. http://gomix.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-state_machine/rubygem-state_machine.spec http://gomix.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-state_machine/rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-2.fc13.src.rpm $ rpmlint -i rubygem-state_machine.spec rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-2.fc13.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. wish granted :)
Any news on this review? :)
rubygem-state_machine-doc.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Documentation files, rdoc, ri, examples and tests. Just fix that when you import the package. Package APPROVED.
Thank u Michael... :) updates requests done for updates-testing with the fix https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/rubygem-state_machine
What is the status of this bug? Can this bug be closed?
Thanks Mamoru, closed ! Its on F12 and F13 stable already.
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygem-state_machine New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: gomix
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-state_machine Short Description: Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class Owners: gomix Branches: el6 el5 InitialCC: gomix
Git done.
rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-6.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-6.el5
rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-6.el6
rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-6.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.