Bug 623682 - errata workflow doesn't work properly in beaker (and rhts)
Summary: errata workflow doesn't work properly in beaker (and rhts)
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Beaker
Classification: Community
Component: scheduler
Version: 0.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high vote
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bill Peck
QA Contact: Karel Srot
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-08-12 14:14 UTC by Karel Srot
Modified: 2011-03-24 13:15 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 2011-03-24 13:15:13 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Karel Srot 2010-08-12 14:14:55 UTC
Description of problem:

Hi, back again with errata workflow problems. I have executed few workflows and none of them passed, .e.g
https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/11854

The main problem is the failure during 
/distribution/comparative/prepare-rhtslib 
(downgrade fails which means that "old" packages to be tested in errata workflow are not present)

Later on also 
/distribution/comparative/upgrade-rhtslib
fails. Maybe the failure during a downgrade phase is the reason, I didn't have a change to verify it yet.

The same applies for RHTS
http://rhts.redhat.com/cgi-bin/rhts/recipes.cgi?id=436070
therefore it seems to be a problem in both tests. Unfortunately I do not know where to file a bug againts them. Feel free to reassing it to a right component. 


How reproducible:
clone https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/11854

Comment 1 Marian Csontos 2010-08-23 12:47:34 UTC
If it does not work in RHTS it is not a blocker: beaker-blocker is be definition only something  preventing us from switching rhts off.

Comment 2 Karel Srot 2010-08-23 13:39:10 UTC
Well, this is funny. The problem is that pmuller might have a motivation to fix those things when there was only RHTS but as he already said he is not interrested in supporting this "hack" in Beaker. You can remove the blocker but I am afraid that the only result will be the Beaker without a chance to test errata packages.

Comment 3 Michal Nowak 2010-10-08 08:10:26 UTC
Testing z-stream erratum is so painful today. Really reminds me 2007 errata testing on Stable Systems.

Comment 4 Bill Peck 2011-03-23 21:47:54 UTC
Is this working with workflow-tcms?

Comment 5 Karel Srot 2011-03-24 08:57:23 UTC
AFAIK workflow-tcms is working fine. Unfortunately, I can't test it on this particular errata since it has been already released.
I think we can close this bug.

Comment 6 Bill Peck 2011-03-24 13:15:13 UTC
closing.  any new errata issues should be reported against workflow-tcms

Thanks


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.