Bug 623932 - [abrt] crash in evolution-2.30.2-1.fc13: comp_subject: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-2.30.2-1.fc13: comp_subject: Process /usr/bin/evolu...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 638605
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:798ec88c2859c99c4cbb7c17503...
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-08-13 07:52 UTC by Peter Green
Modified: 2010-11-09 14:04 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 14:04:09 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (57.95 KB, text/plain)
2010-08-13 07:52 UTC, Peter Green 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Peter Green 2010-08-13 07:52:13 UTC 
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: evolution
comment: Accepted a meeting request, causing the app to crash.
component: evolution
crash_function: comp_subject
executable: /usr/bin/evolution
global_uuid: 798ec88c2859c99c4cbb7c1750316060c33389da
kernel: 2.6.33.6-147.fc13.x86_64
package: evolution-2.30.2-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
1. In messages view, opened a meeting request
2. Clicked "accept"
3. When prompted, I opted to send update notifications to the organiser.
4. Evolution crashed
Comment 1 Peter Green 2010-08-13 07:52:16 UTC 
Created attachment 438616 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 14:04:09 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 638605 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 14:04:09 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #638605.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.