Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/nesc.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nesc-1.3.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: The nesC language was designed to support the TinyOS project. nesC provides several advantages over C: a component model based on bi-directional interfaces, whole-program compilation for performance and a simple concurrency model for embedded systems.
$ rpmlint nesc.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/nesc-1.3.2-1.fc13.i686.rpm nesc.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/nescc-ncg.1.gz 2: warning: `LO' not defined nesc.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/nescc-mig.1.gz 2: warning: `LO' not defined nesc.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ncc/deputy_stage1.h nesc.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/nescc.1.gz 2: warning: `LO' not defined nesc.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ncc/nesc_nx.h nesc.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ncc/deputy_stage2.h nesc.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ncc/deputy_nodeputy.h nesc.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/nescc-wiring.1.gz 2: warning: `LO' not defined 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/nesc-1.3.2-1.fc13.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Successful Koji builds for F-13, F-14, EL-5 and EL-6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2399185 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2399189 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2399176 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2399181 To test nesc, create a file BlinkP.nc with the following: === BlinkP.nc === module BlinkP { } implementation { int c; void increment() { c++;} } === END === and compile using: $ nescc -c -fnesc-cfile=BlinkP.c BlinkP.nc
Url should be http://nescc.sourceforge.net/ and Summary should be e.g. "The nesC compiler"
Shakthi, update the URL as Jussi recommended, but keep your summary as is, since with a package name "nesc", "The nesC compiler" does not convey much as information to the user. - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. Approved
Updated URL. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/nesc.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nesc-1.3.2-2.fc15.src.rpm
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nesc Short Description: Compiler used by TinyOS Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-13 F-14 EL-5 EL-6
Git done (by process-git-requests).
nesc-1.3.2-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nesc-1.3.2-2.fc13
nesc-1.3.2-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nesc-1.3.2-2.fc14
nesc-1.3.2-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nesc-1.3.2-2.el5
(In reply to comment #3) > Shakthi, > update the URL as Jussi recommended, but keep your summary as is, since > with a package name "nesc", "The nesC compiler" does not convey much as > information to the user. Well, the odd thing here is that the tarball name is nesc instead of nescc, which it should be logically (nesC compiler). I don't think "Compiler used by TinyOS" is a better summary than "The nesC compiler", since the former doesn't really hold any exact information about the package. In general a project may have many requirements, so in general summaries like "library used by foo" are frowned upon. Just my 2c.
@Jussi: Thanks for your feedback and comments. nesC is a programming language, and nescc is the name of the compiler. "Compiler used by TinyOS" is more apt because the compiler was written for TinyOS, and not for any other OS.
nesc-1.3.2-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nesc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nesc-1.3.2-2.fc14
nesc-1.3.2-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nesc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nesc-1.3.2-2.el5
With this patch: http://till.fedorapeople.org/tmp/nesc-1.3.1-vim-ftdetect.patch And these commands: # properly install vim syntax file install -m 644 -p -D tools/editor-modes/vim/filetype.vim $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/vim/vimfiles/ftdetect/nesc.vim install -m 644 -p -D tools/editor-modes/vim/nesc.vim $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/vim/vimfiles/syntax/nesc.vim You can also properly install the nesc syntax files for vim.
nesc-1.3.2-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nesc-1.3.2-3.fc14
nesc-1.3.2-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nesc-1.3.2-3.fc13
nesc-1.3.2-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
nesc-1.3.2-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
nesc-1.3.2-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.