Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 625756 - (CVE-2005-4889) CVE-2005-4889 rpm: fails to drop SUID/SGID bits on package removal
CVE-2005-4889 rpm: fails to drop SUID/SGID bits on package removal
Status: NEW
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability (Show other bugs)
unspecified
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Red Hat Product Security
impact=moderate,source=cve,reported=2...
: Security
Depends On: 125517 626709 626710
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-08-20 07:23 EDT by Tomas Hoger
Modified: 2018-06-21 04:49 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2010:0678 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: rpm security update 2010-09-07 10:35:00 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Tomas Hoger 2010-08-20 07:23:23 EDT
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures assigned an identifier CVE-2005-4889 to the following vulnerability:

lib/fsm.c in RPM before 4.4.3 does not properly reset the metadata of an executable file during deletion of the file in an RPM package removal, which might allow local users to gain privileges by creating a hard link to a vulnerable (1) setuid or (2) setgid file, a related issue to CVE-2010-2059. 

References:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=125517
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598775
http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/59426

This issue was fixed in Fedora rpm some time ago via bug #125517.  RPM versions in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 and 4 do not contain the fix and are affected.
Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2010-09-07 10:35:25 EDT
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4

Via RHSA-2010:0678 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0678.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.