Bug 626250 - Plots "with step" for decreasing functions show no steps
Summary: Plots "with step" for decreasing functions show no steps
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnuplot (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64 Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ivana Varekova
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-08-23 00:02 UTC by Horst H. von Brand
Modified: 2010-08-24 02:09 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-08-24 02:09:08 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
A plot file showing the problem (the steps should be between the curves) (137 bytes, application/octet-stream)
2010-08-23 00:02 UTC, Horst H. von Brand
no flags Details

Description Horst H. von Brand 2010-08-23 00:02:09 UTC
Created attachment 440276 [details]
A plot file showing the problem (the steps should be between the curves)

Description of problem:
In the attached plot I try to show how 1/x and 1/(x - 1) bound 1/floor(x), but the plot shows just one step.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnuplot-4.4.0-5.fc15.x86_64

How reproducible:
Some functions work, others don't.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. plot[1:10] 1/floor(x) with step
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Just one step

Expected results:
There should be 10 steps

Additional info:

Comment 1 Horst H. von Brand 2010-08-23 01:18:41 UTC
Also present in gnuplot from CVS (as of today, identifies itself as 4.5 patchlevel 0), reported as <https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3051121&group_id=2055&atid=102055>

Comment 2 Horst H. von Brand 2010-08-24 02:09:08 UTC
Closed upstream. 1 is an integer, dividing that by something > 1 gives (integer) zero.

Sorry for the noise. At least I learned something...


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.