Bug 626381 - [abrt] crash in SfxCommonTemplateDialog_Impl::~SfxCommonTemplateDialog_Impl
Summary: [abrt] crash in SfxCommonTemplateDialog_Impl::~SfxCommonTemplateDialog_Impl
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openoffice.org
Version: 13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Caolan McNamara
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:f408fd3f54eabcee49e400e6b84...
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2010-08-23 12:26 UTC by Andre Costa
Modified: 2010-08-27 08:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-08-27 08:54:29 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (66.11 KB, text/plain)
2010-08-23 12:26 UTC, Andre Costa
no flags Details

Description Andre Costa 2010-08-23 12:26:53 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib64/openoffice.org3/program/simpress.bin -impress
component: openoffice.org
crash_function: SfxCommonTemplateDialog_Impl::~SfxCommonTemplateDialog_Impl
executable: /usr/lib64/openoffice.org3/program/simpress.bin
package: openoffice.org-impress-1:3.2.0-12.31.fc13
rating: 3
reason: Process /usr/lib64/openoffice.org3/program/simpress.bin was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
time: 1282513919
uid: 500

How to reproduce
1. writer was opened and had a table that had been copied to a presentation (via "paste special")
2. impress was closed

Comment 1 Andre Costa 2010-08-23 12:26:56 UTC
Created an attachment (id=440370)
File: backtrace

Comment 2 David Tardon 2010-08-23 15:27:13 UTC
Cannot reproduce. The stack suggests that templates were involved. Perhaps one of the documents was created from template? Or the template manager was opened at the time of the crash?

Comment 3 Andre Costa 2010-08-23 15:39:11 UTC
Hi David,

indeed, the presentation was created from a template, but if I recall correctly template manager was not opened when OO crashed. I'll try to reproduce it using the same presentation.

Comment 4 Caolan McNamara 2010-08-27 08:54:29 UTC
Can't reproduce and there's nothing obvious in the backtrace that gives a hint as to something relatively local to that stack which might be flawed :-(, feel free to reopen if you know how to get it to happen again.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.