Bug 626896 – Review Request: python-xlwt - Library to write data as Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files

Bug 626896 - Review Request: python-xlwt - Library to write data as Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files

Summary:	Review Request: python-xlwt - Library to write data as Microsoft Excel (tm) s...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 613766

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-08-24 12:41 EDT by Guillaume Lemaître
Modified:	2013-10-19 10:42 EDT (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-08-25 04:42:07 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Guillaume Lemaître 2010-08-24 12:41:13 EDT

Spec URL: http://codemetre.free.fr/fedora/python-xlwt.spec
SRPM URL: http://codemetre.free.fr/fedora/python-xlwt-0.7.2-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description: 
xlwt is a library for generating spreadsheet files that are compatible
with Excel 97/2000/XP/2003, OpenOffice.org Calc, and Gnumeric. xlwt has
full support for Unicode. Excel spreadsheets can be generated on any
platform without needing Excel or a COM server.

This is my first package, and I'm seeking a sponsor.

Comment 1 Thomas Spura 2010-08-25 04:42:07 EDT

Thanks for your efforts in creating a package and trying to find a sponsor, but unfortunately there is already a pending review of python-xlwt, you could try to find another package to become sponsored and help reviewing the other review request instead.

Then you could maybe co-maintain the package with the poster of bug #613766.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 613766 ***

Comment 2 Guillaume Lemaître 2010-08-25 12:04:00 EDT

Sorry for the inconvenience, I was almost sure that this hasn't been done yet. I'll check twice next time.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.