Bug 62732 - ifcfg-eth* stores incorrect info. after removing some NICs
Summary: ifcfg-eth* stores incorrect info. after removing some NICs
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 61169
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: net-tools
Version: 7.3
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Phil Knirsch
QA Contact: Ben Levenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-04-04 23:56 UTC by Danny Trinh
Modified: 2015-03-05 01:10 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-04-08 07:11:13 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Files before and after remove a NIC card (1.29 KB, application/octet-stream)
2002-04-04 23:57 UTC, Danny Trinh
no flags Details

Description Danny Trinh 2002-04-04 23:56:29 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows 98)

Description of problem:
After installing beta4 on the server which has 3 NIC cards, I shut down and 
remove one of NIC card, then reboot server. I run ifconfig and see only 1 NIC 
(eth0). I check /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 and find out that was 
incorrect info.
Below is the content of ifcfg-eth0:
DEVICE=eth1
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
ONBOOT=yes



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Use PE1650 + 2 embedded NIC + 1 intel 100B
2.Install Hampton beta4. Make sure you turn on "DHCP" and "active at boot" 
options for all 3 NICs.
3.Reboot server and check ifcfg-eth* contents.
4.Shutdown server and remove the intel 100B NIC.
5.Reboot server and answer kudzu questions.
6.Run ifconfig
7.Check the contents of ifcfg-eth0 and ifcfg-eth1
	

Actual Results:  Writing wrong info to ifcfg-eth* after remove one NIC.

Expected Results:  Suppose to be correct as expected

Additional info:

Comment 1 Danny Trinh 2002-04-04 23:57:45 UTC
Created attachment 52284 [details]
Files before and after remove a NIC card

Comment 2 Danny Trinh 2002-04-05 23:02:17 UTC
For more info. related to this bug, please see bug# 61169

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2002-04-09 16:56:57 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 61169 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.