Description of problem: [root@preethi ~]# pulp-admin -u admin -p admin package info --name=zsh --repoid=test "Traceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pulp/server/webservices/controllers/base.py\", line 51, in report_error\n return method(self, *args, **kwargs)\n File \"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pulp/server/webservices/role_check.py\", line 102, in check_roles\n result = f(instance, *fargs, **kw)\n File \"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pulp/server/webservices/controllers/repositories.py\", line 277, in get_package\n return self.ok(api.get_package(id, name))\n File \"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pulp/server/api/repo.py\", line 179, in get_package\n packages = self.packages(id, name)\n File \"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pulp/server/api/repo.py\", line 166, in packages\n repo = self._get_existing_repo(id)\n File \"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pulp/server/api/repo.py\", line 85, in _get_existing_repo\n raise PulpException(\"No Repo with id: %s found\" % id)\nPulpException: u'No Repo with id: test found'\n"
This should now report more gracefully suggesting $ sudo pulp-admin package info --name=zsh --repoid=i-dont-exist Package [zsh] not found in repo [i-dont-exist] We could make additional check to see if repo exists first.. but thats another call to the rest interface which seems unnecessary. This should suggest the user that he's trying to access a package that doesn't exist where ever he's trying to look.
Fixed in 0.77.
Fixed in build 0.78.
I would prefer it say the repo does not exist. But moving to verified as per comment above. still thinks this needs to be fixed if there is time. [root@preethi ~]# pulp-admin -u admin -p admin package info --name=zsh --repoid=test Package [zsh] not found in repo [test]
Closing with community release pulp-0.0.139-1.fc14.noarch