RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 627958 - be2net: A bad assert in processing async messages from NIC
Summary: be2net: A bad assert in processing async messages from NIC
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ivan Vecera
QA Contact: Caspar Zhang
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-08-27 13:43 UTC by Subbu Seetharaman
Modified: 2011-05-19 12:38 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: kernel-2.6.32-83.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 12:38:37 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to remove a bad assert (1.05 KB, patch)
2010-08-27 14:18 UTC, Subbu Seetharaman
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2011:0542 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.1 kernel security, bug fix and enhancement update 2011-05-19 11:58:07 UTC

Description Subbu Seetharaman 2010-08-27 13:43:53 UTC
An unexpected message received from NIC could cause a crash due to a stale assert. This should be removed.

Comment 2 Subbu Seetharaman 2010-08-27 14:18:37 UTC
Created attachment 441527 [details]
Patch to remove a bad assert

Async notifications other than link status are possible in certain
configurations. Remove the BUG_ON in the mcc completion processing path.

This patch has been submitted upstream

Subbu

Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2010-10-05 01:50:41 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has 
requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed 
products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.

Comment 5 Aristeu Rozanski 2010-11-17 19:45:39 UTC
Patch(es) available on kernel-2.6.32-83.el6

Comment 8 Caspar Zhang 2011-05-04 09:41:01 UTC
Hi, do you have any idea of how to produce the bad assert to reproduce the bug & verifying?

Comment 10 Subbu Seetharaman 2011-05-04 11:19:32 UTC
I cant think of any way to reproduce the problem.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 12:38:37 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0542.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.