Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 62820

Summary:	suggest Xnest and Xvfb should be User Interfaces/X instead of User Interfaces/X Hardware Support
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Public Beta	Reporter:	Jay Berkenbilt <ejb>
Component:	XFree86	Assignee:	Mike A. Harris <mharris>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	skipjack-beta1	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-04-05 23:32:23 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jay Berkenbilt 2002-04-05 20:24:31 UTC

Description of Problem:

Xnest and Xvfb are both X servers that are not tied to any specific hardware by
design.  They are in the group "User Interfaces/X Hardware Support" with the
other X servers, but I think they really belong in "User Interfaces/X" with
things like vncserver.  This is relevant mostly during installation when
selecting individual packages.  Of course, no functionality is affected here,
but it would be a trivial change to make.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

XFree86-Xnest-4.2.0-6.47
XFree86-Xvfb-4.2.0-6.47

Presumably this still holds in skipjack-beta2, but I haven't finished
downloading it yet to check. :-)

Comment 1 Mike A. Harris 2002-05-21 07:56:26 UTC

Sounds sensible.  I've made the change in my current devel tree.  Will
appear in future release down the line.

Thanks.

Comment 2 Mark J. Cox 2003-06-25 15:52:28 UTC

An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. 
This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen 
this bug report if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-066.html