SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/festival-freebsoft-utils.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: A collection of utilities that enhance Festival with some useful features. They provide all that is needed for interaction with Speech Dispatcher. Key festival-freebsoft-utils features are: - Generalized concept of input events. festival-freebsoft-utils allows not only plain text synthesis, but also combining it with sounds. Additionally, mechanism of logical events mapped to other events is provided. - Substitution of events for given words. - High-level voice selection mechanism and setting of basic prosodic parameters. - Spelling mode. - Capital letter signalization. - Punctuation modes, for explicit reading or not reading punctuation characters. - Incremental synthesis of texts and events. - Speech Dispatcher support. - Rudimentary SSML support. - Enhance the Festival extension language with functions commonly used in Lisp. - Support for wrapping already defined Festival functions by your own code. - Everything is written in the extension language, no patching of the Festival C++ sources is needed. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2434778
I'll review it
Koji build for F-13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2490061 REVIEW: Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + rpmlint is silent Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ~/Desktop/festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc13.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. +/- The License field in the package spec file does not match the actual license (should be GPLv2+, not simply GPLv2). + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10.tar.gz* c16cbd1d5494b1b058b787ef936fa483ac2f3ce92657372c92b3dbf153750457 festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10.tar.gz c16cbd1d5494b1b058b787ef936fa483ac2f3ce92657372c92b3dbf153750457 festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10.tar.gz.1 Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture (see koji link above) + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No header files. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Just three minor suggestions: * Consider building docs also * Use %{_datadir} macro in the %install section * Fix licensing tag (GPLv2+ instead of GPLv2) This package is APPROVED.
Thanks, will fix the above before initial commit. New Package GIT Request ======================= Package Name: festival-freebsoft-utils Short Description: A collection of utilities that enhance Festival with some useful features Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-14 F-13 F-12 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc13
festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc14
festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc12
festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update festival-freebsoft-utils'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc14
festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
festival-freebsoft-utils-0.10-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.