Bug 629095 - misleading icon for encrypted channels
Summary: misleading icon for encrypted channels
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kaffeine
Version: 13
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kevin Kofler
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-08-31 22:01 UTC by Sundtek
Modified: 2011-06-10 18:06 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-06-10 18:06:58 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
KDE Software Compilation 251100 0 None None None Never

Description Sundtek 2010-08-31 22:01:37 UTC
Description of problem:

encrypted channels show up the icon for unencrypted channels

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

just scan a dvb-c network which has encrypted TV stations.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:

it should show up a screen with a small red lock icon.

Additional info:
See http://www.sundtek.de/images/fc13.png

Also see:
http://www.sundtek.de/images/network.png (this is an example).

Comment 1 Thomas Janssen 2010-09-13 12:53:49 UTC
Upstream bug: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=251100

Comment 2 Thomas Janssen 2010-09-13 13:21:04 UTC
Upstream response:

the problem isn't about icons, but about the detection of scrambled
channels (cross-check: right-clicking on the channels and selecting edit will
show the channel editor where the check box "scrambled" most likely isn't
checked).

finding out whether a particular channel is scrambled or not depends on
meta-information from the broadcaster (EN300468 / SDT) which might or might not
be correct ...

--------------------------------------

Could you please check via the channel editor if the checkbox "scrambled" is checked or not? I can't check myself here, sorry. 

Thanks and best regards
Thomas

Comment 3 Bug Zapper 2011-05-31 14:52:08 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 13.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '13'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 13's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 13 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-10 17:55:55 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 5 Kevin Kofler 2011-06-10 18:06:58 UTC
Thomas Janssen's question has gone unanswered by the reporter for 9 months (!), closing.

We can reopen the bug if (and only if) the requested information is provided.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.