Bug 629920 – GFS1 vs GFS2 performance issue

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 629920 - GFS1 vs GFS2 performance issue

Summary:	GFS1 vs GFS2 performance issue

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	kernel (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	6.0
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Abhijith Das
QA Contact:	Cluster QE
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:	504188
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-09-03 05:39 EDT by Steve Whitehouse
Modified:	2011-05-19 08:36 EDT (History)
CC List:	11 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:	kernel-2.6.32-83.el6
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	504188
Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-05-19 08:36:03 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Combined rhel6 patch posted to rhkernel-list (3.77 KB, patch) 2010-10-21 11:32 EDT, Abhijith Das	no flags	Details \| Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHSA-2011:0542	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	Important: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.1 kernel security, bug fix and enhancement update	2011-05-19 07:58:07 EDT

Groups: None (edit)

Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2010-10-04 21:56:29 EDT

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has 
requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed 
products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.

Comment 2 Abhijith Das 2010-10-21 11:32:39 EDT

Created attachment 454869 [details]
Combined rhel6 patch posted to rhkernel-list

http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhkernel-list/2010-October/msg01226.html

Comment 3 David Teigland 2010-10-29 17:03:32 EDT

posted part 1 of 2 to rhkernel (dlm part)
http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhkernel-list/2010-October/msg01546.html

Comment 4 Abhijith Das 2010-10-29 19:17:17 EDT

posted part 2 of 2 to rhkernel (the rest)
http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhkernel-list/2010-October/msg01547.html

Dave, there's one hunk in this patch relating to dlm.h that I don't see in upstream. It just edits comments about error codes returned by a function.

Comment 5 David Teigland 2010-11-01 10:15:49 EDT

Thanks Abhi, I guess it may as well go in via your patch.  I'll ack that on the list.

Comment 6 Aristeu Rozanski 2010-11-17 14:46:57 EST

Patch(es) available on kernel-2.6.32-83.el6

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 08:36:03 EDT

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0542.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.