Bug 630752 - [abrt] nautilus-sendto-2.28.4-3.fc13: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/bin/nautilus-sendto was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] nautilus-sendto-2.28.4-3.fc13: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/b...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 620634
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: nautilus-sendto
Version: 13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bastien Nocera
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:97bb729663ead1fff0a04172364...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-09-06 19:10 UTC by Hugo Melendez
Modified: 2010-11-09 14:40 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 14:40:00 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (37.62 KB, text/plain)
2010-09-06 19:10 UTC, Hugo Melendez 		no flags Details
View All

Description Hugo Melendez 2010-09-06 19:10:38 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus-sendto file:///home/hmelendez/Desktop/Proyectos/Telefonica%20-%20jBPM/02.%20Material%20de%20trabajo/Prueba%20de%20estres/SIGRES/results/prueba1/result_20100820-1253.txt file:///home/hmelendez/Desktop/Proyectos/Telefonica%20-%20jBPM/02.%20Material%20de%20trabajo/Prueba%20de%20estres/SIGRES/results/prueba1/result_20100820-1254.txt
component: nautilus-sendto
crash_function: magazine_chain_pop_head
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus-sendto
kernel: 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64
package: nautilus-sendto-2.28.4-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus-sendto was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
time: 1282319697
uid: 500
Comment 1 Hugo Melendez 2010-09-06 19:10:42 UTC 
Created an attachment (id=443356)
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 14:40:00 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 620634 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 14:40:00 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #620634.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.