Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 631761
[Pango][Cursoring][mr_IN] - Composed Character Deletion is wrong with DELETE Button
Last modified: 2015-09-15 03:03:25 EDT
Description of problem: In pango (tested it in gedit and firefox), the deletion with DELETE key, is not following the rule of deleting entire composed character with a single key press. It is deleting each of the character in a composed character, one by one. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.28.1-3.el6.x86_64 pangomm-2.26.0-1.el6.x86_64 gedit-2.28.4-3.el6.x86_64 firefox-3.6.8-1.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit or firefox in mr_IN locale 2. Activate ibus with CTRL+SPACE. Select marathi - Inscript 3. Type : kdk (which means consonant KA + Halant + Consonant KA) 4. Position the cursor at the beginning point of the composed character. 5. Now, press DELETE key. (It needs 3 key strokes to delete the whole character, but it should be done with a single key stroke in fact) Actual results: Delete composed character is happening in wrong manner. Actually it is now following the convention (Rule) of BACKSPACE, when deleting a composed character comes into picture. Expected results: It should delete the whole composed character in one DELETE key stroke when cursor positions at the start of the composed character. Additional info:
OS : RHEL6-Workstation-Snapshot-13 Arch : x86_64
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an exception in the current release, please ask your support representative.
This seems not yet fixed in even f20. though the cursor stops in between. is it also wrong then?