Spec URL: http://smooge.fedorapeople.org/mediawiki/mediawiki115.spec SRPM URL: http://smooge.fedorapeople.org/mediawiki/rhel-5-i386/mediawiki115-1.15.5-5.el5.src.rpm Description: MediaWiki is the software used for Wikipedia and the other wikimedia Foundation websites. Compared to other wikis, it has an excellent range of features and support for high-traffic websites using multiple servers This bundles the 1.15.x version of mediawiki for replacement for RHEL-4/5/6 usage. This version does not contain patches that current Fedora mediawiki contains due to their conflict with upstreams patch sets.
The following is based purely off the spec file... - = N/A / = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [/] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [/] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [/] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Language specific items [?] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=... [?] Rpmlint output: [/] Package is not relocatable. [/] Buildroot is correct ( Not needed if >= EL6 and >= F13 ) Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root [/] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [/] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [/] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [-] With any Subpackage installed the license must also be installed (this may belong to another subpackage) [/] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [?] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [/] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [/] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [/] Package must own all directories that it creates. [/] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [/] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [?] Permissions on files are set properly. [/] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. ( Not needed if >= EL6 and >= F13 ) [/] Package consistently uses macros. [/] Package contains code, or permissible content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [/] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [/] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [/] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [!] Latest version is packaged. [/] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested through koji [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: fedora-5E-epel-testing-candidate [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [?] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the tests pass === COMMENTS === * tetex-latex should probably be tex(latex) * tetex-dvips should probably be tex(dvips) * 1.15.5 is now out This was based SOLELY on the spec file to get some motion.
SRPM updates http://smooge.fedorapeople.org/mediawiki/rhel5-x86_64/mediawiki115-1.15.5-5.el5.src.rpm RPMS http://smooge.fedorapeople.org/mediawiki/rhel4-x86_64 http://smooge.fedorapeople.org/mediawiki/rhel6-x86_64 http://smooge.fedorapeople.org/mediawiki/rhel5-x86_64
[/] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2530808 [/] Rpmlint output: [mchappel@mchappel rpmbuild]$ rpmlint mediawiki115-1.15.5-5.el5.* mediawiki115.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Wikimedia -> Wikipedia, Wiki media, Wiki-media mediawiki115.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Wikimedia -> Wikipedia, Wiki media, Wiki-media mediawiki115.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/texvc115 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [/] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 01c4c85fb96991d962c8acb3d892ec2d mediawiki-1.15.5.tar.gz 01c4c85fb96991d962c8acb3d892ec2d SOURCES/mediawiki-1.15.5.tar.gz [-] File based requires are sane. [?] Package functions as described. [/] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested through koji [/] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: fedora-5E-epel-testing-candidate Final comments... Non-critical but worth doing before the first push: * tetex-latex should probably be tex(latex) * tetex-dvips should probably be tex(dvips) Should get fixed first: * mediawiki115.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/texvc115 You can probably use "execstack -c" to clear this, not sure how to double check that texvc115 doesn't get broken though (don't generally use mediawiki)
Scratch built -6 through koji: [mchappel@mchappel rpmbuild]$ rpmlint mediawiki115-1.15.5-6.el5.* mediawiki115.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Wikimedia -> Wikipedia, Wiki media, Wiki-media mediawiki115.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Wikimedia -> Wikipedia, Wiki media, Wiki-media 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Requires now uses tex() virtual provides. All issues fixed. APPROVED.
Please re-raise the fedora-cvs flag when you provide an SCM request for us to process. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mediawiki115 New Branches: el4 el5 el6 Owners: smooge
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mediawiki116 Short Description: A wiki engine Owners: smooge Branches: el4 el5 el6 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mediawiki115 New Branches: rawhide Owners: smooge
I'm afraid I don't understand your request; every package automatically receives a devel branch. It does not need to be requested.
Built and shipped. Closing.