Bug 63378 - qt2 package from up2date not gpg signed
Summary: qt2 package from up2date not gpg signed
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: qt2
Version: skipjack-beta2
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tim Powers
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-04-13 04:01 UTC by Joe Bayes
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-04-15 03:21:09 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Joe Bayes 2002-04-13 04:01:08 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020301

Description of problem:
The qt2-2.3.1-3.i386.rpm package being distributed via up2date is not gpg signed. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
bash$ rpm -Kvv qt2-2.3.1-3.i386.rpm
D: Expected size:      4609867 = lead(96)+sigs(160)+pad(0)+data(4609611)
D:   Actual size:      4609867
qt2-2.3.1-3.i386.rpm:
MD5 sum OK: c24e403e26e303ff5909c37e13af2ab3
bash$

Actual Results:  I saw only an md5 checksum, not a gpg signature

Expected Results:  I expected a gpg signature.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Warren Togami 2002-04-14 11:22:48 UTC 
I'm quite sure that none of the Rawhide and Beta packages are GPG signed.  
Doesn't everyone have to turn off GPG checking for the beta?
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2002-04-15 03:21:04 UTC 
No, this one slipping through was an accident.
Comment 3 Tim Powers 2002-04-15 13:19:12 UTC 
This was fixed on Saturday.

I am closing this as rawhide.

Tim
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.