Bug 6366 – gimp-data-extras claims to be packaged by Trond Eivind Glomsrxd

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 6366 - gimp-data-extras claims to be packaged by Trond Eivind Glomsrxd

Summary:	gimp-data-extras claims to be packaged by Trond Eivind Glomsrxd

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	gimp-data-extras (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	6.1
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Michael K. Johnson
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	1999-10-26 02:27 EDT by Chris Siebenmann
Modified:	2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	1999-11-18 16:04:41 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Chris Siebenmann 1999-10-26 02:27:55 EDT

Although gimp-data-extras is an official RedHat RPM
package, an 'rpm -qi gimp-data-extras' shows that it
claims to have been packaged not by RedHat but instead
by 'Trond Eivind Glomsrxd <teg@pvv.ntnu.no>'.

 Presumably there is an explicit Packager: in the RPM
spec file that RedHat is using. It should probably be
removed.

Comment 1 David Lawrence 1999-10-26 16:38:59 EDT

This has been verified.

Comment 2 Michael K. Johnson 1999-11-18 16:04:59 EST

Trond originally packaged it and we haven't significantly changed it
(just rebuilt it, as far as I can tell) since, so why take away the
credit from a clueful packager?

We tend to remove the Packager line if we make significant changes
to the package.  We make significant changes to many packages, so
very few packages have a Packeger line in them.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.