Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 636774

Summary: [abrt] corosync-1.2.8-1.fc13: raise: Process /usr/sbin/corosync was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Retired] Corosync Cluster Engine Reporter: Lorenzo Sartoratti <lorenzo.sartoratti>
Component: unknownAssignee: Jan Friesse <jfriesse>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 1.2CC: agk, asalkeld, fdinitto, jfriesse, sdake
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:011b02d62eff11adfd6b8085b5dcf0ce27c6db70
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-06-28 13:41:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
Fplay of the coredump none

Description Lorenzo Sartoratti 2010-09-23 08:33:05 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: corosync
comment: I've just openede case number 636583
component: corosync
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/sbin/corosync
kernel: 2.6.34.6-47.fc13.x86_64
package: corosync-1.2.8-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/sbin/corosync was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
time: 1285229696
uid: 0

How to reproduce
-----
1.
2.
3.
don't know

Comment 1 Lorenzo Sartoratti 2010-09-23 08:33:08 UTC
Created attachment 449149 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Steven Dake 2010-09-23 17:34:47 UTC
Thanks for filing the bugzilla.  Could you run corosync-fplay on the crashed node?  This will playback the flight record.  Are you running a two node cluster?

If you have a "FAILED TO RECEIVE" condition in the fplay, that would indicate there is some logic error remaining in the failed to receive handling.  Please note that Bug 619496 should offer relief from this problem.

Regards
-steve

Comment 3 Steven Dake 2010-09-23 17:37:05 UTC
Likely a dup of Bug 636583.

Comment 4 Lorenzo Sartoratti 2010-09-23 19:05:58 UTC
Created attachment 449282 [details]
Fplay of the coredump

I've attached the fplay requested
Tomorrow I will test my network switches

Comment 5 Lorenzo Sartoratti 2010-09-23 19:08:24 UTC
I'm running a four node cluster

Comment 6 Lorenzo Sartoratti 2010-10-01 08:15:16 UTC
Same as 636583
I think we can consider the bug closed
Thank for the support!

Lorenzo Sartoratti

Comment 7 Bug Zapper 2011-05-31 12:48:48 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 13.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '13'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 13's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 13 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 8 Jan Friesse 2011-06-28 13:41:20 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 636583 ***