Bug 63731 – File listed twice: /usr/share/xemacs-21.4.6/lisp/finder-inf.elc

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 63731 - File listed twice: /usr/share/xemacs-21.4.6/lisp/finder-inf.elc

Summary:	File listed twice: /usr/share/xemacs-21.4.6/lisp/finder-inf.elc

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification:	Retired
Component:	xemacs (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	1.0
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Trond Eivind Glomsrxd
QA Contact:	Aaron Brown
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2002-04-17 20:13 EDT by Tyler Daniel
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:42 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-04-18 14:42:11 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Tyler Daniel 2002-04-17 20:13:08 EDT

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 Galeon/1.2.0 (X11; Linux i686; U;) Gecko/20020308

Description of problem:
This file is listed twice in the provides for some reason..
Since it is listed explicitly in xemacs.spec, commenting it out fixes the problem.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Didn't try


Additional info:

Comment 1 Tyler Daniel 2002-04-18 14:42:06 EDT

I was just able to reproduce this error after a new rpm -i and rpm -ba xemacs.spec.

Comment 2 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2002-04-18 14:51:04 EDT

The reason it's listed explicitly, is that the install process won't necesarrily
detect this file if xemacs is already installed. Listing it explicitly doesn't
harm, but ensures it's included.

Comment 3 Tyler Daniel 2002-04-19 14:06:06 EDT

My rebuild of the rpm fails because the file is listed twice.  I'm using rpm ver
rpm-4.0.2-8..

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.