Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 63735 - speedo fonts.dir empty
speedo fonts.dir empty
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: XFree86 (Show other bugs)
7.3
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Mike A. Harris
David Lawrence
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2002-04-17 21:20 EDT by Jim Wright
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:42 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-04-19 05:32:57 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Jim Wright 2002-04-17 21:20:58 EDT 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2.1) Gecko/20010901

Description of problem:
In trying to track down why we get so many &^$#(*^ rpmnew files when
applying errata to a never-touched, fresh install, I came across...

# ls -al /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/fonts.dir*
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         1689 Apr 15 14:14
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/fonts.dir
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root            0 Apr 10 23:27
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/fonts.dir.rpmnew

# rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/fonts.dir
XFree86-base-fonts-4.2.0-6.62

Looks like this package might have a bad fonts.dir file.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Didn't try


Additional info:
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2002-04-18 15:01:38 EDT 
This is an rpm issue.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 62542 ***
Comment 2 Mike A. Harris 2002-04-19 05:37:46 EDT 
Actually...  this was an actual XFree86.spec bug not an rpm bug..
A few files were wrongly flagged as %config that should not have been.
Fixed in XFree86 4.2.0-6.666.

Duplicate of public bug #63357
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.