Bug 637365
| Summary: | There is now way to configure the list of acceptable CA's for client authentication | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Wolter Eldering <wolter.eldering> | ||||||
| Component: | mod_nss | Assignee: | Rob Crittenden <rcritten> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Chandrasekar Kannan <ckannan> | ||||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||||
| Version: | 5.4 | CC: | benl, dpal | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | |||||||||
| : | 719401 (view as bug list) | Environment: | |||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-07-06 17:54:11 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 719401 | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Wolter Eldering
2010-09-25 08:30:02 UTC
I assume an rfc1845 name is an NSS nickname? RFC 1845 is an experimental SMTP extension as far as I can tell. There is a commented-out block of code starting with: /* we only wan't to do this onece not for every server */ This doesn't need to be here at all, right? It looks like this patch mixes in some changes you had submitted in bug 635324, is that right? Should the error that is printed from "CERT_LIST_EMPTY(ca_certs)" really say something like "acceptable certificates not found in NSS database or something?" It looks like it would be possible to add a CA that doesn't exist in the database as long as you configure at least one that does. The rfc1845 name is the Subject of the certificate, see CERT_FilterCertListByCANames in certvfy.c Yes the comment can be removed. You're right that's also included, I'll attach a new patch on top of the one for bug 635324. In this patch at least one of the certificates named (by subject) should be in the database as a trusted ca for SSL. An alternative would be to check if the list after filtering has the same length as the list of acceptable CA's specified. In that way all of the acceptable CA's listed in the option must be in the database. Created attachment 450077 [details]
add AcceptableCANames option
Processed remarks
The patch will be accepted upstream and will be delivered as a version that will be included into RHEL7. This feature will not be implemented in RHEL 5.x. |