Bug 637436 - [abrt] firefox-3.6.10-1.fc13: Process /usr/lib/firefox-3.6/firefox was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] firefox-3.6.10-1.fc13: Process /usr/lib/firefox-3.6/firefox was killed...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 629794
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: firefox
Version: 13
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Gecko Maintainer
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:1304d2e3d38ae1d2ee3d9acb178...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-09-25 19:58 UTC by nrsandholm
Modified: 2010-11-09 16:23 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 16:23:54 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (52.36 KB, text/plain)
2010-09-25 19:59 UTC, nrsandholm
no flags Details

Description nrsandholm 2010-09-25 19:58:56 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib/firefox-3.6/firefox
comment: I think there is some kind of an problem betweed the banks webpage and open jdk because they don't play together very well.
component: firefox
executable: /usr/lib/firefox-3.6/firefox
kernel: 2.6.34.7-56.fc13.i686.PAE
package: firefox-3.6.10-1.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib/firefox-3.6/firefox was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
time: 1285440404
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1. I was using firefox and entering a bank website which requires java to work, so an applet started loading. 
2. Firefox or java produced some kind of an error, but the error box froze and didn't display any kind of message
3. I closed the error box and along with it went the hole browser and ABRT launched up.

Comment 1 nrsandholm 2010-09-25 19:59:13 UTC
Created attachment 449625 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 16:23:54 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 629794 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 16:23:54 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #629794.

Sorry for the inconvenience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.