Bug 637843 - spamc denials
Summary: spamc denials
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 5.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Grepl
QA Contact: Milos Malik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks: 500397
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-09-27 15:17 UTC by Nalin Dahyabhai
Modified: 2012-10-03 14:57 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

(edit)
Prior to this update, several messages were written to the audit log when Sendmail leaked file descriptors. To prevent this, the SELinux policy has been corrected, and these events are no longer logged.
Clone Of: 500397
(edit)
Last Closed: 2011-01-13 21:50:32 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0026 normal SHIPPED_LIVE selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update 2011-01-12 16:11:15 UTC

Comment 2 Miroslav Grepl 2010-10-01 07:21:03 UTC
RHEL5.6 selinux-policy already has 

sendmail_rw_pipes(spamc_t)


I will add

sendmail_dontaudit_rw_unix_stream_sockets(spamc_t)

Comment 3 Miroslav Grepl 2010-10-01 09:09:10 UTC
Fixed in selinux-policy-2.4.6-286.el5.noarch.

Comment 6 Jaromir Hradilek 2011-01-05 16:21:23 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Prior to this update, several messages were written to the audit log when Sendmail leaked file descriptors. To prevent this, the SELinux policy has been corrected, and these events are no longer logged.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2011-01-13 21:50:32 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0026.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.