Bug 638152 - Needs update!?!
Summary: Needs update!?!
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 648633
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-sphinx
Version: 13
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michel Lind
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-09-28 12:00 UTC by Neal Becker
Modified: 2010-11-01 20:09 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-01 20:09:17 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Neal Becker 2010-09-28 12:00:39 UTC
Description of problem:

Current fedora:
python-sphinx-0.6.6-1.fc13.noarch

Current sphinx release:
Current version: 1.0.4

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-09-28 17:59:15 UTC
1.0.x is an incompatible update of 0.6.x.  (But f14 has 1.0.x already).  Do you have a reason for needing 1.0.x in f13?  If so, maybe someone needs to put together a compat package. python-sphinx1.0-1.0.4.  (Or otoh, it might be an overly specific dependendency version in upstream packaging... I've seen that too.)

Comment 2 Michel Lind 2010-09-29 09:51:52 UTC
As Toshio said above. FYI, when we first transitioned Rawhide (before F-14 was branched) to the pre-1.0 betas, some packages that make use of Sphinx break due to the incompatibilities.

Given that we don't want to potentially force all Sphinx-dependent packages to be upgraded, on a stable release, just because the documentation system changed, we're definitely not updating python-sphinx in F-13. A compatibility package might be a solution, as Toshio suggested.

If you're just using Sphinx for personal use, then just rebuilding the F-14 package for F-13 should work just fine.

Comment 3 Neal Becker 2010-09-29 10:55:52 UTC
Thanks for the information.  I agree with the above recommendations.  Thanks again.

Comment 4 Michel Lind 2010-11-01 20:09:17 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 648633 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.