Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-gen_leader.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-gen_leader-0-0.1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This application implements a leader election behavior modeled after gen_server. This behavior intends to make it reasonably straightforward to implement a fully distributed server with master-slave semantics. This package is one of the requirements for erlang-gproc and etorrent. Koji scratch build for F-14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2503189 rpmlint messages: 1. erlang-gen_leader.ppc: E: no-binary 2. erlang-gen_leader.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 3. erlang-gen_leader.ppc: W: no-documentation All these messages should be ignored. The messages №1 and №2 means that I installed noarch application into arch-dependent library - that's exactly like Erlang/OTP is designed - it stores all its libraries under %{_libdir}/erlang/lib no matter of whether package is arch-dependent or not (unlike python). The message №3 means exactly what it means - there is no documentation for this library (yet).
[ OK ] specfiles match: 67931592d06373389253e810914e8939 [ OK ] source files match upstream: 209792fa762bafdfef1c475b2ffb577c [ OK ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [ OK ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. [ OK ] dist tag is present. [ OK ] build root is correct. [ OK ] license field matches the actual license. [ OK ] license is open source-compatible. [ FAIL ] license text included in package. [ OK ] latest version is being packaged. [ OK ] BuildRequires are proper. [ OK ] compiler flags are appropriate. [ OK ] %clean is present. [ OK ] package builds in mock. [ OK ] package installs properly. [ OK ] debuginfo package looks complete. [ FAIL ] rpmlint is silent. 1. erlang-gen_leader.ppc: E: no-binary 2. erlang-gen_leader.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 3. erlang-gen_leader.ppc: W: no-documentation #1 and #2 are ok. #3 could easily be solved by packaging a copy of the license. [ OK ] final provides and requires are sane [ NA ] %check is present and all tests pass: [ OK ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [ ?? ] owns the directories it creates. What owns /usr/lib64/erlang and /usr/lib64/erlang/lib? Is this package in the requires? [ OK ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [ OK ] no duplicates in %files. [ OK ] file permissions are appropriate. [ OK ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. [ OK ] code, not content. [ OK ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [ OK ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [ OK ] no headers. [ OK ] no pkgconfig files. [ OK ] no libtool .la droppings. [ NA ] desktop files valid and installed properly. Add the license text as a doc and clarify my understanding of the directories and then we will be good to go.
(In reply to comment #1) > [ ?? ] owns the directories it creates. > What owns /usr/lib64/erlang and /usr/lib64/erlang/lib? Is this package in the > requires? ... > Add the license text as a doc and clarify my understanding of the directories > and then we will be good to go. * both /usr/lib64/erlang/lib and /usr/lib64/erlang/ are owned by erlang-erts (listed in runtime Requires) * I'm afraid I can't add license text to %docs because according to guidelines I can (and I must) do it only *if* upstream explicitly adds it to the sources. However I added README file. I also ensured that beam-file is generated with debug_info (it doesn't hurt runtime performance but allows users to provide some static analysis in runtime). New package and spec-file: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-gen_leader.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint output is much better now: Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc12.ppc.rpm erlang-gen_leader.ppc: E: no-binary erlang-gen_leader.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
APPROVED
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: erlang-gen_leader Short Description: A leader election behavior modeled after gen_server Owners: peter Branches: f12 f13 f14 el6 el5 InitialCC:
One last note which is certainly not a blocker, the spec lists version as 0, but the file itself has a version of 1.4 in it. This looks to be a CVS generated version, but nonetheless you may want to consider following upstream's version.
Git done (by process-git-requests).
erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc12
erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc13
erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.el5
erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc14
erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-gen_leader'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc12
erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
erlang-gen_leader-0-0.2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.