Bug 640948
| Summary: | inodes display incorrectly when listing rules | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Eduard Benes <ebenes> |
| Component: | audit | Assignee: | Steve Grubb <sgrubb> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.0 | CC: | bmason |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | audit-2.0.6-1.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
when an ignore directive was included in an audit.rules configuration file, the auditctl utility became unresponsive when attempting to load those rules. With this update, the issue is resolved.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 607823 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2011-05-19 13:55:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 607823 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Comment 2
Steve Grubb
2011-02-04 18:51:40 UTC
Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
Diffed Contents:
@@ -1 +1 @@
-32-bit systems did not behave correctly when an audit rule with a large inode value was added, because of a signed number conversion. With this update, auditctl treats the inode value as an unsigned number+when an ignore directive was included in an audit.rules configuration file, the auditctl utility became unresponsive when attempting to load those rules. With this update, the issue is resolved.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0653.html |