Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 641276 - (CVE-2010-3780) CVE-2010-3780 Dovecot: Busy master process, receiving a lot of SIGCHLD signals rapidly while logging, could die
CVE-2010-3780 Dovecot: Busy master process, receiving a lot of SIGCHLD signal...
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability (Show other bugs)
unspecified
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Red Hat Product Security
Ales Zelinka
public=20101006,reported=20101006,sou...
: Security
Depends On: 654226
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-10-08 04:49 EDT by Jan Lieskovsky
Modified: 2011-05-19 10:04 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 10:04:36 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2011:0600 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: dovecot security and enhancement update 2011-05-19 07:47:01 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Jan Lieskovsky 2010-10-08 04:49:25 EDT
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures assigned an identifier CVE-2010-3780 to
the following vulnerability:

Dovecot 1.2.x before 1.2.15 allows remote authenticated users to cause
a denial of service (master process outage) by simultaneously
disconnecting many (1) IMAP or (2) POP3 sessions.

References:
[1] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-3780
[2] http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-October/053450.html

Upstream changeset:
[3] http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/e67b892c9ff3
Comment 1 Jan Lieskovsky 2010-10-08 04:52:09 EDT
This issue did NOT affect the versions of the dovecot package, as shipped
with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 and 5.

--

This issue does NOT affect the versions of the dovecot package, as shipped
with Fedora release of 12 and 13 (relevant packages are already updated).
Comment 4 Karel Volný 2011-01-26 11:27:49 EST
do we have any realiable reproducer? - "Dovecot master process *could have* died if ..." doesn't sound too convincing to me
Comment 5 Michal Hlavinka 2011-01-27 03:00:18 EST
(In reply to comment #4)
> do we have any realiable reproducer? - "Dovecot master process *could have*
> died if ..." doesn't sound too convincing to me

I'm not aware of such reliable reproducer. You'll need to have a lot of connections at the same time (in theory 3, but not with idle master process) and still there's only (medium) chance, no guarantee.
Comment 6 Karel Volný 2011-01-27 08:48:00 EST
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > do we have any realiable reproducer? - "Dovecot master process *could have*
> > died if ..." doesn't sound too convincing to me
> 
> I'm not aware of such reliable reproducer. You'll need to have a lot of
> connections at the same time (in theory 3, but not with idle master process)
> and still there's only (medium) chance, no guarantee.

thanks for the info

so this'd be SanityOnly, no testcase will be written
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 07:47:07 EDT
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Via RHSA-2011:0600 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0600.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.