Description of problem: Adding Errata using 'Channel -> Manage Software Channels -> 'Clone Child Channel' -> Errata -> Add -> Add Red Hat Errata, shows 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5' in the Channel version drop down list, even if clone channel's Parent channel is 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4' Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Red Hat Network Satellite 5.3.0 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Clone a RHEL 4 child channel 2. 'Channel -> Manage Software Channels -> 'Cloned Child Channel' -> Errata -> Add -> Add Red Hat Errata 3. The Channel Version and Channel shows 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5' Actual results: The Channel Version and Channel shows 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5' Expected results: The Channel Version and Channel should show 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4', or it's correct Parent Channel Additional info: This issue is not reproducible for Base/Parent Clone channels. Not reproducible on RHNS 5.2.x as well.
Displaying correct Channel and Channel Version for child channels. spacewalk.git: a3cb77008d980b7c3e35f6e3a2bf151cca142915
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: Cause Not checking channel version for child channels Consequence When Adding Red Hat erratum to a child channel, always list of RHEL5 errata will be offered to clone Result When Adding Red Hat erratum to a child channel, correct list of errata will be offered to clone
Taking a QA contact.
Switching to VERIFIED. Testing procedure: - Reproducer from comment 0 - Ensured also that also parent channels operates correctly - Compared behaviour to sat530 and stock sat540 Verified against: spacewalk-java-1.2.39-36.el5sat
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0362.html