RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 643341 - memmem, strstr, and strcasestr are broken
Summary: memmem, strstr, and strcasestr are broken
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: glibc
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Andreas Schwab
QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 641128
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-10-15 11:01 UTC by RHEL Program Management
Modified: 2022-07-09 05:16 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glibc-2.12-1.7.el6_0.1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, the generic implementation of the strstr() and memmem() functions did not handle certain periodic patterns correctly and could find a false positive match. This error has been fixed, and both functions now work as expected.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-10 18:57:37 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2010:0872 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: glibc security and bug fix update 2010-11-10 12:10:56 UTC

Description RHEL Program Management 2010-10-15 11:01:52 UTC
This bug has been copied from bug #641128 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.0 z-stream (EUS).

Comment 4 Jaromir Hradilek 2010-10-15 14:19:57 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Previously, the generic implementation of the strstr() and memmem() functions did not handle certain periodic patterns correctly and failed to find a match. This error has been fixed, and both functions now work as expected.

Comment 5 Eric Blake 2010-10-15 14:27:49 UTC
The bug was false positive matches, not false negatives.  I updated the
technical note accordingly.

Comment 6 Eric Blake 2010-10-15 14:27:49 UTC
    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Previously, the generic implementation of the strstr() and memmem() functions did not handle certain periodic patterns correctly and failed to find a match. This error has been fixed, and both functions now work as expected.+Previously, the generic implementation of the strstr() and memmem() functions did not handle certain periodic patterns correctly and could find a false positive match. This error has been fixed, and both functions now work as expected.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2010-11-10 18:57:37 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0872.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.