Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 64348
"Back" button should probably say "Previous" in Xconfigurator
Last modified: 2007-04-18 12:42:24 EDT
The "Back" button should probably be named "Previous" instead. This is a similar
request as that for anaconda (bug 63753).
I don't see this change as advantagous really. Back is well understood
in meaning, and used in most GUI software, including GNOME, KDE, and
Windows uses "Previous" (tested with Windows 2000). GNOME uses "Previous".
Haven't had the possibility to test with other environemnts yet though.
This change was requested precisely because the current use in Red Hat Linux is
inconsistant with many other environments.
Lets not make this a game of reopen/reclose please. It serves no useful
purpose. The change is simply not happening. End of story.
Even if other modules change? Consistency is not important, no?
If you want some motive (besides consistency), then you should consider that
"Previous" is more precise than "Back" under these circumstances. "Back" is used
in browser-like applications with a history. In these cases "Back" can go back
to any page that happens to be in the browser history immediately before the
current page. Using "Previous" under these circumstances is most likely
misleading, since there is no "ordering" except what happens to be defined by
the browsing history, which can really be in any order.
On the other hand, "Previous" is what's used in druids/wizards/installations
etc. In this case, every page has a precisely defined order, not a random one.
For this reason, and that it's also not as broad as "Back", it's probably why
it's used in these situations.
Xconfigurator, anaconda, and other similar Red Hat software are more close to
the druid/installation/wizard use cases than a web browser use case.
Xconfigurator is being replaced in the future with other tools, so there
is no point in making such a change, regardless of any rationalizations
there may be.