Bug 644761 – python-libs conflict on ia64 compatlayer

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 644761 - python-libs conflict on ia64 compatlayer

Summary:	python-libs conflict on ia64 compatlayer

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	python (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	5.6
Hardware:	ia64 Linux

Priority	high Severity high
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Dave Malcolm
QA Contact:	Petr Šplíchal
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:	638638
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-10-20 04:17 EDT by Alexander Todorov
Modified:	2016-05-31 21:40 EDT (History)
CC List:	4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:	python-2.4.3-37.el5
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	The python-libs.i386 package is now available for 64-bit Itanium with the 32-bit Itanium compatibility mode.
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-01-13 18:10:37 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHSA-2011:0027	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	Low: python security, bug fix, and enhancement update	2011-01-13 05:58:29 EST

Groups: None (edit)

Description Alexander Todorov 2010-10-20 04:17:50 EDT

Description of problem:

When trying to install compatlayer packages on ia64 there is a file conflict between python-libs-2.4.3-32.el5.i386 and python-libs-2.4.3-32.el5.ia64

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
python-libs-2.4.3-32.el5

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install ia64, Server, @everything
2. Install ia32el and start the service
3. Try to install all compatlayer packages
  
Actual results:
Transaction Check Error:
  file /usr/lib/python2.4/BaseHTTPServer.pyc from install of python-libs-2.4.3-32.el5.i386 conflicts with file from package python-libs-2.4.3-32.el5.ia64
  file /usr/lib/python2.4/BaseHTTPServer.pyo from install of python-libs-2.4.3-32.el5.i386 conflicts with file from package python-libs-2.4.3-32.el5.ia64
  file /usr/lib/python2.4/Bastion.pyc from install of python-libs-2.4.3-32.el5.i386 conflicts with file from package python-libs-2.4.3-32.el5.ia64
  file /usr/lib/python2.4/Bastion.pyo from install of python-libs-2.4.3-32.el5.i386 conflicts with file from package python-libs-2.4.3-32.el5.ia64

and continues

Expected results:
No errors

Additional info:
python-libs is a new sub-packages added in 5.6. Maybe we can remove the i386 counterpart from the tree and the problem is gone.

Comment 1 Alexander Todorov 2010-10-20 04:19:20 EDT

Adding Daniel Mach to CC. 

Daniel, please see the Additional info in the previous comment.

Comment 10 Eva Kopalova 2010-12-20 05:22:31 EST

    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
The python-libs.i386 package is now available on ia64 for the ia32el compatibility mode.

Comment 11 Eva Kopalova 2011-01-10 05:34:10 EST

    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1 +1 @@
-The python-libs.i386 package is now available on ia64 for the ia32el compatibility mode.+The python-libs.i386 package is now available for 64-bit Itanium with the 32-bit Itanium compatibility mode.

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2011-01-13 18:10:37 EST

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0027.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.