Bug 645204 - [abrt] java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-43.1.8.2.fc13: Process /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/bin/java was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-43.1.8.2.fc13: Process /usr/lib/jvm/java-...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 688453
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
Version: 13
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Denis Lila
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:a8df9b1a949e5760b4580bcf430...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-10-21 01:03 UTC by Mario F. Waïde-Naïm
Modified: 2011-03-28 20:58 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
: 646525 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-03-28 20:58:38 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (22.22 KB, text/plain)
2010-10-21 01:03 UTC, Mario F. Waïde-Naïm
no flags Details

Description Mario F. Waïde-Naïm 2010-10-21 01:03:17 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: java -Dazureus.install.path=/home/Marhabah/.azureus/app -Dazureus.script.version=2 -Dazureus.script=/usr/bin/azureus org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main
component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
executable: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/bin/java
kernel: 2.6.33.3-85.fc13.i686
package: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-43.1.8.2.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/bin/java was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
time: 1287590209
uid: 500

Comment 1 Mario F. Waïde-Naïm 2010-10-21 01:03:21 UTC
Created attachment 454707 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Brad S 2010-10-25 14:08:37 UTC
This version of Java (currently in updates) is broken.  I've had to downgrade to get anything Java related to reall work.  For example, the popular EVO collab tool won't work with Fedora 13 right now:

http://evo.caltech.edu/evoNext/koala.jnlp

Comment 3 Omair Majid 2010-10-25 14:27:40 UTC
Hi Brad,

(In reply to comment #2)
> This version of Java (currently in updates) is broken.  I've had to downgrade
> to get anything Java related to reall work.  For example, the popular EVO
> collab tool won't work with Fedora 13 right now:
> 
> http://evo.caltech.edu/evoNext/koala.jnlp

This bug report is about a crash in the JVM. Are you getting this crash as well when you run the EVO collab tool? If not, could you please file a separate bug report against java-1.6.0-openjdk?  Also please describe the problem in a little more detail. If this is indeed broken, I would really like to identify the problem and fix it.

Thanks!

Comment 4 Brad S 2010-10-25 14:57:35 UTC
I get the following problem:

[bws@localhost:~:1050]$ javaws http://evo.caltech.edu/evoNext/koala.jnlpnet.sourceforge.jnlp.LaunchException: Fatal: Launch Error: Could not launch JNLP file.
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher.launchApplication(Launcher.java:462)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher$TgThread.run(Launcher.java:731)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to create locks directory (/tmp/bws/netx/locks)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.SingleInstanceLock.getLockFile(SingleInstanceLock.java:132)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.SingleInstanceLock.<init>(SingleInstanceLock.java:55)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.XSingleInstanceService.checkSingleInstanceRunning(XSingleInstanceService.java:131)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.ServiceUtil$PrivilegedHandler$1.run(ServiceUtil.java:187)
	at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.ServiceUtil$PrivilegedHandler.invoke(ServiceUtil.java:192)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.$Proxy9.checkSingleInstanceRunning(Unknown Source)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.ServiceUtil.checkExistingSingleInstance(ServiceUtil.java:139)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher.launchApplication(Launcher.java:389)
	... 1 more
Caused by: 
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to create locks directory (/tmp/bws/netx/locks)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.SingleInstanceLock.getLockFile(SingleInstanceLock.java:132)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.SingleInstanceLock.<init>(SingleInstanceLock.java:55)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.XSingleInstanceService.checkSingleInstanceRunning(XSingleInstanceService.java:131)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.ServiceUtil$PrivilegedHandler$1.run(ServiceUtil.java:187)
	at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.ServiceUtil$PrivilegedHandler.invoke(ServiceUtil.java:192)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.$Proxy9.checkSingleInstanceRunning(Unknown Source)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.services.ServiceUtil.checkExistingSingleInstance(ServiceUtil.java:139)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher.launchApplication(Launcher.java:389)
	at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher$TgThread.run(Launcher.java:731)


I suppose that is not a sigabrt, but an unhandled exception.  Whatever it is, I've had to yum downgrade to get *anything* java related to work after this upgrade.  Including my payroll application which caused me a large degree of consternation of course.  Let me know if I should enter an new bug report.  There are so many bugs open on OpenJDK I just kind of assumed that everyone had the same problem.  I wanted to provide a simple test case -- EVO.

Comment 5 Brad S 2010-10-25 14:59:56 UTC
Crap, ignore this.  I assumed two of the same problem were related.  My payroll application is indeed broken.  Maybe its as simple as a stale lock directory as well.

Comment 6 Omair Majid 2010-10-25 15:10:10 UTC
I have filed a separate bug to track the javaws failure. Lets move this discussion to over there.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646525

Comment 7 Denis Lila 2011-03-28 20:58:38 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 688453 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.