Bug 646180 - [abrt] nautilus-2.30.1-6.fc13: killpg: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] nautilus-2.30.1-6.fc13: killpg: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed b...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 587508
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: nautilus
Version: 13
Hardware: i686
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:e9c105e4cd250a0d0b2eba2a9a8...
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2010-10-24 19:52 UTC by pseudo64
Modified: 2015-03-03 22:54 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 13:42:48 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (71.97 KB, text/plain)
2010-10-24 19:52 UTC, pseudo64
no flags Details

Description pseudo64 2010-10-24 19:52:22 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
component: nautilus
crash_function: killpg
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
package: nautilus-2.30.1-6.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
time: 1287948234
uid: 500

How to reproduce
1.  installed FC 13
2.  Had firefox open to a few tabs
3.  Updated computer 1 (included updates to rpm, yum, and one other basic thing)
4.  UPdated computer #2 (included 400+ updates)
5.  Was asked to log out so that programs could remain secure. clicked log out.  Screen immediately faded to black then white.
6.  Moved mouse a few minutes later and saw login prompt. Logged in.  Saw the nautilus crash, and the green man icon indicating it didn't log out like I thought it did, cause it still wants to log out.

Comment 1 pseudo64 2010-10-24 19:52:25 UTC
Created attachment 455364 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 13:42:48 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 587508 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 13:42:48 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #587508.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.