Description of problem: I find several virsh help or man page tiny typo, so use this bug to track this kind of issues. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libvirt-0.8.4-3.fc15.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. man page line 447 2. man page line 307 3. Actual results: 1. domain-id can be specified as an short integer 2. edit domain.xml Expected results: 1. Change 'an' to 'a' 2. virsh edit domain.xml Additional info:
fixed, upstream patch: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-November/msg00101.html
on man page of virsh for command migrate it loses optional parameters and description such as --p2p --direct --tunnelled --persistent --undefinesource --copy-storage-inc --copy-storage-all for command attach-disk, it loses the optional parameters and description --sourcetype
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-November/msg00819.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-November/msg00818.html these two patches are pushed.
also http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-November/msg00766.html
1.# virsh help reboot ......................... DESCRIPTION Run a reboot command in the target domain. .......................... Description incorrect. Expected:"Run reboot command in host to reboot target domain"
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
(In reply to comment #0) > Description of problem: > I find several virsh help or man page tiny typo, so use this bug to track this > kind of issues. The initial complaint of typos has been fixed. New issues should be reported on libvir-list or filed as new BZs. (In reply to comment #5) > 1.# virsh help reboot > ......................... > DESCRIPTION > Run a reboot command in the target domain. This has nothing to do with typos; while I agree that this wording could be improved, it should be brought up on the list rather than extending the life of this bug. Besides, > .......................... > > Description incorrect. Expected:"Run reboot command in host to reboot > target domain" I'm not sure I like this suggested wording any better. The host really does request that the guest reboot itself (either via an ACPI interrupt or via a guest agent command); the host can't do the reboot itself, since reboot requires guest cooperation. Maybe it would be better as: 'request that the target domain be rebooted (requires guest cooperation)' but again, bring that up on list.
Marking as closed nextrelease; it's not worth backporting spelling fixes into F14 at this time, but newer versions should have fewer typos. I'm also doing another sweep of 'an' misuses, via https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-December/msg00176.html