RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
EFI/UEFI page table initialization in commit 19774aa25f2127f47f38f280f4bd44d7e156771c uses EFI's memory descriptor type
like an attribute mask. The type field of the memory descriptor is an enumerated
type. This incorrect discrimination of type results in nearly all types of
EFI memory descriptors being accessible from EFI. This was not the intent
of the initialization routine efi_pagetable_init. Only EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE
and EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA pte entries should be constructed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.0

How reproducible:
Any x86_64 EFI/UEFI booted machine.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has 
requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed 
products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.

Patch(es) available on kernel-2.6.32-89.el6

Any plan for 6.0.z? Recently I noticed that kdump did not work on Fujitsu
server without this patch when the server has large memory(1TB memory). I
think this patch(and also bz668825) is necessary for 6.0.z.

(In reply to comment #8)
> Any plan for 6.0.z? Recently I noticed that kdump did not work on Fujitsu
> server without this patch when the server has large memory(1TB memory). I
> think this patch(and also bz668825) is necessary for 6.0.z.

bz# 664364 is what corrected Fujitsu according to testing in this bz. bz#  654665
isn't related. As for 6.0.z I would think Fujitsu can answer.

Ok, I'll ask Fujitsu about it, thanks.

> Any new updates or comments from Fujitsu on this one?

Yeah, Fujitsu requested fix for 6.0.z on CASE#00412086, and it seems that RH'll provide hotfix instead of errata.