Description of problem: In satellite 5.3 the Page for the Packages on the Activation key has only 9 Lines. So you have much scrolling work on the page. And the second Problem is, that the page isn't sorted anymore. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Red Hat Network Satellite 5.3.0 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a activation key 2. Click Packages 3. Enter package names 4. Click 'Update Key' Actual results: Package names are not sorted (alphabetically) Expected results: Package names should be sorted Additional info: Older releases didnt show this behaviour.
Fixed. Sorting package names according to alphabetic order. spacewalk.git: 5303c4e85ce4f0f5e17efdaf313a7934d325ab0f
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: Consequence: When associating packages with an activation key, package list was sorted in unpredictable way. Result: Package list in sorted in alphabetical order, when associating packages to an activation key on WebUI.
Verified RHEL5/6
Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. Diffed Contents: @@ -1,4 +1 @@ -Consequence: +When associating packages with an activation key, the previous version of the web user interface listed the packages in random order. This update adapts the web user interface to list the packages in alphabetical order.-When associating packages with an activation key, package list was sorted in unpredictable way. -Result: -Package list in sorted in alphabetical order, when associating packages to an activation key on WebUI.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1252.html