Bug 655119

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Hi Vaios,

I noticed there is not driver version update for this patchset.  Can you attach one here?

Can you fix this?

Thanks, Rob

Hi Vaios,

Also, please include a rhel5.6 version of Dick Kennedy's patch:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=453228

from 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640225#c3

with the version update patch and attach both here.

This is pretty urgent.

Thanks, Rob

Created attachment 462714 [details]
Patchset to update Emulex LPFC driver to 8.2.0.87.1p - rev 2

Patchset that now contains a version bump.

Also, the previously submitted driver for RHEL5.6, 8.2.0.87, contains all the fixes necessary for NetApp (bz640225), including Dick's fix Rob referenced in his previous comment. No additional patches are necessary

Joe

(In reply to comment #6)
> Created attachment 462714 [details]
> Patchset to update Emulex LPFC driver to 8.2.0.87.1p - rev 2
> 
> Patchset that now contains a version bump.
> 
> Also, the previously submitted driver for RHEL5.6, 8.2.0.87, contains all the
> fixes necessary for NetApp (bz640225), including Dick's fix Rob referenced in
> his previous comment. No additional patches are necessary
> 
> Joe

I just unwound the tar file and only saw the version bump as the new patch.  
Looks like I am still missing Dick's patch?

Old:

[revers@revers-desk lpfc-8.2.0.87-8.2.0.87.1p]$ ls -l
total 32
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers  631 Nov 18 13:17 ChangeLog
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers 2406 Nov 18 11:47 r9491_CR111515.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers  794 Nov 18 11:47 r9492_CR111516.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers 1232 Nov 18 11:47 r9493_CR110885.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers 1800 Nov 18 11:47 r9494_CR110883.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers  907 Nov 18 11:47 r9495_CR111997.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers  711 Nov 18 11:47 r9496.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers 1110 Nov 18 11:47 README
[revers@revers-desk lpfc-8.2.0.87-8.2.0.87.1p]$ 

New:

[revers@revers-desk lpfc-8.2.0.87-8.2.0.87.1p]$ ls -l
total 36
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers  488 Nov 24 12:41 ChangeLog
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers 2406 Nov 24 12:41 r9491_CR111515.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers  794 Nov 24 12:41 r9492_CR111516.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers 1232 Nov 24 12:41 r9493_CR110885.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers 1800 Nov 24 12:41 r9494_CR110883.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers  907 Nov 24 12:41 r9495_CR111997.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers  711 Nov 24 12:41 r9496.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers  441 Nov 24 12:41 r9563.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 revers revers 1110 Nov 24 12:41 README
[revers@revers-desk lpfc-8.2.0.87-8.2.0.87.1p]$

Rob

Rob,

Per Joe in comment #6:
...
Also, the previously submitted driver for RHEL5.6, 8.2.0.87, contains all the
fixes necessary for NetApp (bz640225), including Dick's fix Rob referenced in
his previous comment. No additional patches are necessary
...

No additional patches are expected or were supposed to be included in the latest Comment #6 patchset.

-Vaios-

(In reply to comment #8)

Excellent, thanks.

*** Bug 599487 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

in kernel-2.6.18-235.el5
You can download this test kernel (or newer) from http://people.redhat.com/jwilson/el5

Detailed testing feedback is always welcomed.

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0017.html

Rob, or anyone:

do you know if we have the hardware / test case needed to reproduce this issue
in-house?

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days