Bug 655731 - T065agentextend_simple fails on s390x and ppc64
Summary: T065agentextend_simple fails on s390x and ppc64
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: net-snmp
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jan Safranek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-11-22 10:28 UTC by Dan Horák
Modified: 2010-11-23 08:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: net-snmp-5.6-4.fc15
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-23 08:58:54 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dan Horák 2010-11-22 10:28:58 UTC
Test T065agentextend_simple from net-snmp 5.6 fails on s390x and ppc64

extending agent functionality with extend ......................... 
not ok 2 - found 0 copies of 'hello_world' in output (/tmp/snmp-test-T065agentextend_simple-26763/output-simple_run26763-1); expected 1
not ok 3 - found 0 copies of 'hello_world' in output (/tmp/snmp-test-T065agentextend_simple-26763/output-simple_run26763-2); expected 1
not ok 4 - found 0 copies of 'hello_world' in output (/tmp/snmp-test-T065agentextend_simple-26763/output-simple_run26763-3); expected 1
not ok 5 - found 0 copies of 'INTEGER: 1' in output (/tmp/snmp-test-T065agentextend_simple-26763/output-simple_run26763-4); expected 1
not ok 6 - found 0 copies of 'INTEGER: 0' in output (/tmp/snmp-test-T065agentextend_simple-26763/output-simple_run26763-5); expected 1
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 5/9 subtests 

Test environments:
Fedora Rawhide on s390x
RHEL-6 on ppc64

Package version:
net-snmp-5.6-2.fc15

Comment 1 Jan Safranek 2010-11-22 14:45:56 UTC
Note to self: it seems to be fixed in current SVN trunk.

Comment 2 Jan Safranek 2010-11-22 15:18:01 UTC
Fixed in SVN rev. 19485, with following comment: "Not sure what the implications of this bug were. It might have caused very strange table behavior on 64-bit big endian systems." :)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.