Bug 656965 - [abrt] evolution-2.32.1-1.fc14: (SIGSEGV) bbdb_sync_buddy_list_in_thread
Summary: [abrt] evolution-2.32.1-1.fc14: (SIGSEGV) bbdb_sync_buddy_list_in_thread
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 651025
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution
Version: 14
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:170021ff57771384210c8712095...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-11-24 15:31 UTC by Didi Hoffmann
Modified: 2010-11-25 10:10 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-25 10:10:28 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (60.24 KB, text/plain)
2010-11-24 15:31 UTC, Didi Hoffmann
no flags Details

Description Didi Hoffmann 2010-11-24 15:31:36 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.14
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: evolution
component: evolution
crash_function: bbdb_sync_buddy_list_in_thread
executable: /usr/bin/evolution
kernel: 2.6.35.6-48.fc14.x86_64
package: evolution-2.32.1-1.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
How to reproduce: Just send an email with exchange
time: 1290612524
uid: 500

Comment 1 Didi Hoffmann 2010-11-24 15:31:38 UTC
Created attachment 462671 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Milan Crha 2010-11-25 10:09:06 UTC
Thanks for a bug report. I see it was trying to synchronize your pidgin buddies in the contact list and it failed to get list of contacts, but as it didn't check for errors properly, then it failed and used uninitialized memory.

Thread 1 (Thread 3401):
#0  bbdb_sync_buddy_list_in_thread (data=0x275d730) at gaimbuddies.c:229
        contacts = 0x4
#1  0x0000003b78a69446 in g_thread_create_proxy (data=0x3b45b80) at gthread.c:1897
#2  0x0000003b77a06d5b in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#3  0x0000003b76ee4aad in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6

Comment 3 Milan Crha 2010-11-25 10:10:28 UTC
Ah, we have this filled already, thus I'm marking it as a duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 651025 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.