Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 658508 - /etc/pam.d/radiusd uses non-existent password-auth module instead of system-auth
/etc/pam.d/radiusd uses non-existent password-auth module instead of system-auth
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: freeradius2 (Show other bugs)
5.8
Unspecified Unspecified
low Severity medium
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: John Dennis
Aleš Mareček
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-11-30 10:29 EST by John Dennis
Modified: 2012-02-21 00:36 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 00:36:25 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0196 normal SHIPPED_LIVE freeradius2 bug fix and enhancement update 2012-02-20 09:54:08 EST

  None (edit)
Description John Dennis 2010-11-30 10:29:50 EST
The freeradius-pam-conf file in the SRPM which gets installed as /etc/pam.d/radiusd uses password-auth instead of system-auth. The change from system-auth to password-auth was deliberate in Fedora and RHEL6. Unfortunately the Fedora/RHEL6 version of the file was applied to RHEL5. The RHEL5 version of the file needs to change password-auth back to system-auth.
Comment 2 John Dennis 2011-08-05 10:09:51 EDT
This bug should be addressed by rebasing freeradius2 in a future RHEL5 update.
Comment 3 John Dennis 2011-09-19 16:18:42 EDT
Updated freeradius-pam-conf and spec file. Waiting until new upstream release to rebuild for RHEL5.8 in which FreeRADIUS2 will be a rebase.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 00:36:25 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0196.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.